Student safety
Check current age requirements, use appropriate supervision and give learners a clear route to a trusted adult.
Put student safety, privacy and human judgement at the centre of your school’s AI decisions.
Clear expectations help a school use AI thoughtfully, without treating every classroom task the same.
Responsible AI is a school-wide habit, not a warning at the end of a lesson. It includes age-appropriate access, safe prompts, privacy, fact checking, honest assessment and people who know what to do when something goes wrong.
Start by listening to teachers, students and parents. Identify the tools people already encounter, the questions they have and the differences between classroom learning and assessed work. Give the school community an understandable set of expectations.
Keep human judgement central. A model cannot take responsibility for a pupil’s wellbeing, a teacher’s decision or the school’s handling of personal information.
Check current age requirements, use appropriate supervision and give learners a clear route to a trusted adult.
Use fictional examples and minimal information. Avoid uploading identifiable learner records to public tools.
Explain allowed assistance for each task. Ask students to disclose permitted help and show their own reasoning.
Treat generated claims, sources and images as material to examine. Compare with original, reliable evidence.
Approve classroom outputs, consider bias and accessibility, and retain human assessment and support decisions.
Explain the purpose, rules and supervision arrangements. Offer a clear contact for questions or concerns.
Use examples instead of a vague instruction to “use AI responsibly”. Explain whether a learner may ask for a different explanation, receive feedback on a draft or use help with research. State when assistance is restricted because the assignment assesses that very skill.
Include a response to inappropriate content, misleading outputs and accidental sharing. Learners should be able to ask for help without feeling that reporting a problem will automatically punish them.
The school policy framework covers purpose, permitted uses, privacy, responsibilities, disclosure and review. Pair it with examples of the academic integrity boundary.
A document alone does not teach a child to check an answer or a teacher to review a tool. Use AI Smart & Safe for younger learners, AI Ready for junior and senior students and AI for Educators for staff practice.
Review the policy when tools, provider terms or school needs change. Keep the discussion proportionate to the learning activity and consult the appropriate responsible staff on privacy or safeguarding questions.
Kenya’s ODPC provides guidance for education institutions and guidance on children’s data. These are authoritative references for review; the practical material on this site is educational guidance rather than legal advice.
Different tasks need different boundaries. Consider age, privacy, the learning objective and supervision. Some tasks should remain independent; others can include explicitly permitted assistance.
It is a practical starting point for a school’s own review. It does not provide government approval or a legal compliance determination.
Tell us your school or institution name, your name, role, preferred phone or email, and the program you are interested in. County or location is optional. No long explanation is needed.
Choose AI Smart & Safe, AI Ready, AI for Educators, AI Builder or Not Sure Yet. BritaCore will discuss dates, suitability and arrangements with you.
Email opens your email app with a short enquiry template. If it does not open, write to info@britacore.com or use the details on our contact page. An enquiry does not reserve a session or cohort place.